Editorial Policy

How an article gets made

1. Research. Keyword and search-intent research uses DataForSEO data; every factual claim in a published article must trace to a cited, retrievable source.
2. Drafting. A writer model produces a draft strictly from the assembled evidence bundle — it may not invent testing, users, quotes, prices, or statistics.
3. Deterministic checks. Automated checks run first: schema validity, duplicate/similarity checks, broken links, disclosure presence, and a scan for secrets, PII, or disallowed topics.
4. Three independent reviews. An adversarial fact/freshness reviewer, a search-intent and commercial-integrity reviewer, and an editorial/citation/policy reviewer each evaluate the draft independently, without seeing each other's verdicts.
5. Final decision. A CEO-level model decision — publish, revise, reject, or hold — considers the draft, the evidence, and all three reviews together. A critical issue cannot be waived; it requires a new revision and a full new review round.

What we do not claim

We do not claim a human editor reviewed every article line by line — the review layer is AI-assisted and multi-model, not a newsroom human edit. We do not invent product testing, user interviews, or expert author identities. We do not publish unsupported market-share, user-count, revenue, or conversion claims.

Corrections

If you find an factual error, contact us and we will verify it against current sources and update the article, noting the new "last verified" date.